Participatory Budgeting in Urban Regeneration: Defining the Gap between Formal and Informal Citizen Activism

2019
Alisa Koroļova, Sandra Treija

Urban regeneration has been an ongoing process in many cities for decades. It has experienced various changes in terms of the main driving force, with public engagement becoming more and more important. One of the ways for communities to get involved in urban transformation is through participation in urban planning. Local communities are considered as partners in urban design processes, and in many countries their role in the planning and design is defined by industry regulations. Still, one question is important – is public participation a formal tool or does it have an influence on planning and how it impacts decision making. Along with community involvement in planning processes, participatory budgeting has been developed as a public participatory approach in recent years. This gives a chance for inhabitants to participate in the budgetary decision-making process. The aim of this study is to analyze whether participatory budgeting which is mainly municipal-led urban activism answers the real needs of inhabitants in terms of urban regeneration. The interests of formal urban activism are defined and compared to the interests of informal urban activism actions, the correlations and gaps are defined.

Atslēgas vārdi
Participatory budgeting, the right to the city, urban regeneration
DOI
10.2478/aup-2019-0018
Hipersaite
https://content.sciendo.com/view/journals/aup/15/1/article-p131.xml

Koroļova, A., Treija, S. Participatory Budgeting in Urban Regeneration: Defining the Gap between Formal and Informal Citizen Activism. Architecture and Urban Planning / Arhitektūra un pilsētplānošana, 2019, Vol. 15, 131.-137. lpp. ISSN 1691-4333. e-ISSN 2255-8764. Pieejams: doi:10.2478/aup-2019-0018

Publikācijas valoda
English (en)