Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Methods Comparison
2020
Beate Zlaugotne, Lauma Žihare, Lauma Balode, Antra Kalnbaļķīte, Aset Khabdullin, Dagnija Blumberga

Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) is widely used to solve various decision problems through alternative evaluation. MCDA methods can be used in every field that can define a problem, alternatives and criteria. However, finding the appropriate method can influence the results, in this research five MCDA methods have been tested on the renewable energy sector in Latvia to find the best alternative. The main results showed that TOPSIS, VIKOR and PROMETHEE-GAIA have similar priority selection and the highest ranking was selected for hydropower plant, but MULTIMOORA and COPRAS results were beneficial to Solar PV.


Atslēgas vārdi
COPRAS, MCDA, MULTIMOORA, PROMETHEE-GAIA, renewable energy, TOPSIS, VIKOR
DOI
10.2478/rtuect-2020-0028
Hipersaite
https://content.sciendo.com/view/journals/rtuect/24/1/article-p454.xml

Zlaugotne, B., Žihare, L., Balode, L., Kalnbaļķīte, A., Khabdullin, A., Blumberga, D. Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Methods Comparison. Environmental and Climate Technologies, 2020, Vol. 24, No. 1, 454.-471. lpp. ISSN 1691-5208. e-ISSN 2255-8837. Pieejams: doi:10.2478/rtuect-2020-0028

Publikācijas valoda
English (en)
RTU Zinātniskā bibliotēka.
E-pasts: uzzinas@rtu.lv; Tālr: +371 28399196